GETTING MY HP-38 POWDER TO WORK

Getting My hp-38 powder To Work

Getting My hp-38 powder To Work

Blog Article

I guess I extremely simplified After i reported that HP38 was about similar to BE because based on the melt away charge chart that I use, it is shut on the record but basically slower than BE. Acording to that chart, N320 is in between BE and HP38 but 3n37 is actually a techniques down (slower) on that chart so I'd like what the final results which i get.

So now I am a tiny bit bewildered regrading the bullet form and which load data I really should be working with. Could I make use of the load knowledge for your Sierra 125gr FMJ for my 124 grain x-treme copper plated bullets?

Nearly all of my load knowledge emanates from older resources and in some cases that information is a tad conservative. Nobody would like to be dangerous or reckless but there comes a point when you have to consider the data and say, "this was acceptable 30 a long time in the past, what altered?"

The loads currently appear kind of watered down that is fine, but those 231 loads for 9mm are a complete grain above todays Max, and my suspicion is that the difference is from the powder?!

It should be pointed out that a great deal of that tests was completed before I begun casting and I used to be working with commercially cast bullets. All those bullets were almost always more challenging than wanted and bevel primarily based.

Either sleek or hold the forcing cone angle reamed to the frienglier angle. (DougGuy here does this for just a ton of individuals about the forum).

I've employed AA #seven and Herco and gotten much better velocities than W231, with Superb precision in addition. I have some Electric power Pistol to test with 230 gr bullets in my .45 ACP. I anticipate to receive good final results when I consider PP in my 9mm, as well.

discovered bullseye and pink dot usually additional correct and cleaner.so i have fifty percent a pound still left that .i will burn up .dont Believe I'll invest in it once again.i am hoping i like titegroup superior as wasnt able obtain any bullseye so acquired a pound of it to test.couple of weeks back discovered some bullseye so im superior on that.what i wish to know is an individual established loads with 158 guide in 38 instances and titegroup. details on bottle states three.eight grns could make 920 fps.i wonder if hp-38 powder that may be precise facts.for sure I'll only load a few and try not 50.GSPMAN

Towards the OP, check your scale with check weights to be sure you are obtaining what you believe you're getting!

HP38 is usually a spherical powder that is definitely perfect for very low velocity and mid-assortment goal hundreds. This high Electricity powder presents financial system in loading.  Out there in 14 oz containers.

You are able to evaluate the amount of the home created dipper having a syringe. This may or may not enable your HP38 powde primary.

It's really just the other .... a fast burning powder only takes one/2" of bullet vacation to absolutely burn up Therefore the bullet basically coasts out in the muzzle at a slow velocity.

I do not Feel your trouble is connected with using HP38/231 but rather the hardness with the commercially created bullets.

The remarkable attribute of HP-38, in my experiences, may be the exceptionally broad spectrum of various handgun cartridges, very well about 25 by my depend, and that there is an abundance of loading info accessible from trustworthy sources, together with Wolfe Publishing’s individual LoadData.com.

Report this page